被殖民殖到隱形的人

小一派位,　
電視上出現兩位"雙非"母親,
記者問她們如何看有說"雙非"人搶了本地人學位這個說法,
A說, 吓! 要不是[香港]政府讓我們來[生孩子], 我們怎樣來得了?
B說, 吓! 要不是我們來讀, 你們[香港]的學校有人讀嗎?
身為狹隘香港土人, 聽了得如下分析:

(一) A說你們沒阻止就等於容許, 實情上她是鑽法律空子的, 這個"有空子我就可以鑽, 有什麼問題就責任 在你", 是多麼神級的邏輯! (剛剛才share過'時差出貓'...)。朋友的親戚, 她從中國選擇出國去X國而不是去Y國, 問其原因, 答道: '因為Y國的法制已很完整, 沒什麼空子可以鑽。'

(二), 無論A或B, 自然流露不假修飾, 率直潑辣, 實非扁黃小家的"廣東人"/"香港人"可比。 她們不是什麼五毛, 而是無辜的普羅大眾. 由此可見, 上至至高殖民天朝, 下至殖民政府旗下的人民, 都有一個共通點: '香港原本是沒有人的'. 真是看不到，罪不在他們。
對於自身的存在, 別太武斷啊。你真係肯定你喺度??我現在開始見唔到自己隻手...

(可能英國人在18XX年畫的水彩畫...其實維多利亞和荒野的九龍本來就好多人!!! 只係佢地時運高睇唔到!!!ＸＤＤＤＤ）

On TV. Two "double-negative mothers" appeared. ( = neither parents are Hong Kong citizens. They went to the city to delivery their babies and get citizenship. ie. anchor babies)
They were asked their views on sayings that double-negative children might have snatched the school places of local children. They were flabbergasted.
A: 'If not [your] government let us come, we wouldn't have come!
B: 'If not for us, your schools would be empty!'
A has God level logic.
in both cases, HK people are basically INVISIBLE. Maybe we really are, it is not the colonial government/people's fault that they can't see us. Oops, I can't see my hand!!

[有人說, 咁你們香港人去日本也不是一樣。不一樣。首先日本比香港大很多. 香港比中國小很多。但如果日本人說我們買光了他們的東西, 我就不買好了。東西*先*是人家的。]